cost of ethical clothing

Is ethical clothing expensive?

Something I hear a lot from people is that they would love to shop more ethically, but ethical clothing is just too expensive.  And I do get that.  When money is tight it’s only natural to want that budget to spread as far as possible.

Is ethical clothing expensive though?  When you look at it on the surface, yes, ethical clothing is expensive.  This $120 dress (approximately £89 at time of writing), by Everlane, whose business model is based on ‘radical transparency’ (but apparently not THE most ethical of options), is pretty similar to this £12.90 dress from a company with a low ethical rating.  Why would you spend £76 more on a dress that’s pretty similar?  It’s hard to make the maths add up.

ethical clothing too expensive

When you sit and think about that £12.90 dress though, you begin to think how manufacturers can possibly make a dress for £12.90, and still make a profit.  If you’ve ever tried to make your own clothing you’ll know it’s pretty tricky to make a dress for that amount of money.  By the time you’ve bought the fabric and the pattern, and the thread and any zips or buttons, and the electricity to power your sewing machine, you may well have reached or exceeded that amount, before even accounting for the cost of your own time.

Rather than saying that ethical clothing is expensive, I would argue that the rise of fast fashion retailers have caused us to lose our sense of perspective, and our benchmarks and baselines on what is expensive.

You would expect to pay more for something now than in say, 1980, wouldn’t you?

Since the 1980’s the cost of housing, rent, food, fuel and other consumables has risen, in some cases dramatically.  In 1980 the average cost of a home was £23,000 (around £89,000 in today’s money), whilst by the end of 2016, the average price of a home was £205,000 according to the same report.  The Telegraph reports that lager has increased in price by 336%, whilst a loaf of sliced white bread has increased in price by 235% and eggs by 286%.

It goes without saying then that you would expect to go into a shop and buy an item of clothing that was considerably more expensive now than it was in 1980.

What has actually happened with clothing is that since the 1980s, instead of rising in price in line with inflation, clothes prices have fallen and fallen to the point we’re at now where you get sites like – where every single item of clothing, including shoes, are just £5.

Prior to the 1980’s the majority of clothing was made domestically.  I’ve struggled to find UK based data, but the New York Times reported in 2009 that in the 1960s, the United States made 98% of its shoes.  They stated that in 2009 it was a completely different picture, with the US importing more than 90% of its footwear.  This is more than likely mirrored in clothing manufacture too.

The reason for this outsourcing is that in the 1980s clothing manufacturers realised they could manufacture abroad, in places where they could pay workers considerably less, and where workers could work longer hours in poorer conditions.  This meant ultimately meant greater profits for manufacturers, and lower prices for consumers.

We’re now so used to cheap clothes that have flooded the market since the 1980’s, that this has artificially driven down the value of clothing.  If you’re in your forties or younger you’ll have grown up in an age where clothing has gotten cheaper and cheaper.  You won’t, or will barely remember a time when clothing wasn’t cheap.  Yet going back to the £89 Everlane dress, I suspect that this is more like what the average dress should cost in 2018, if not more.

cost of ethical clothing

It’s also quite clear the impact that the mass production of clothing overseas has had on household spending.  I’ve again struggled to find UK statistics, but census data from the US shows that in the 1950’s households spent 12% of their annual income on clothing.  Fast forward to 2015, and it was reported that households spent just 3.5% of their annual income on clothing, even though Americans are buying more clothes than ever before.  The same article reports that in 1930, the average American woman owned nine outfits, whilst in 2015 that figure was 30 outfits – one for every day of the month.

More worryingly, another report suggests the average item of clothing is worn just seven times before being discarded.  Cheaper prices mean consumers value their clothes less.

So what’s the answer?  I’m not entirely sure.  We can’t suddenly turn the clock back 40 years.  And by suddenly removing manufacture from the countries that depend on clothing manufacture for the overseas market wouldn’t be good for those countries economies.  In 2014 the ready-made garment industry represented 81.13% of Bangladesh’s total export, and of the 4 million workers employed by this industry, 85% are illiterate women from rural villages.

I think part of the answer lies in our relationship with clothing.  Buying less; not buying into trends, and investing in quality timeless pieces are more than likely the way forward.   I’ve written in length about these aspects of consumerism – but in a nutshell ethical fashion isn’t expensive when you factor in the cost per wear of a quality made item, versus a poorly made fast fashion item of clothing that falls to bits after just a few wears.

As consumers, we also have to act more responsibly.  Youtube haul videos with vloggers boasting to impressionable young viewers about how many cheap items of clothing they’ve bought only perpetuate the cheap disposable clothing myth.

Another part of it voting with your wallet. If more and more people shopping with more responsible retailers then this sends a clear message to retailers that they have to up their game and make their clothes more ethically.

Perhaps we have to work on regaining our sense of perspective when it comes to the cost of clothes. Spending more on each individual item of clothing we buy and spending better, but buying far fewer items of clothing is the only way to re-establish sensible baselines on what constitutes as expensive and what constitutes as good quality.

This article originally appeared on Huffington Post.

sheep selfie

Ten Things

sheep selfie

We’re six days into our big renovation, and so far we have discovered two rotten flat roofs that need to be replaced.  If that wasn’t bad enough news, we had a fun visit from Building Standards on Thursday and found out that the existing staircase in the house doesn’t comply with building regulations and needs to be ripped out and replaced.  Excuse me while I softly weep in the corner.

Yesterday we spent the day at our local country park and I decided that I want to have some sheep, goats and chickens as pets.  Maybe some pigs too.  As this point in the renovations I’ve realised it’s basically just too tempting to put our house on the market as it is and move to an off-grid smallholding!  Fingers crossed next week runs a bit smoother!

This week’s links:

1.  Hawaii has become the first US state to ban the sale of sunscreen containing chemicals believed to harm coral reefs.

2.  Time to ditch the wet wipes.

3.  The case for imperfect veganism.

Perhaps the idea of veganism as a philosophy, as opposed to a practice, is what’s working against it. A practice is something that you will occasionally screw up, but that’s fine, because you’re working on it every day. If you screw up a philosophy — like a religion — you have exhibited some form of moral failing. A slip-up becomes a sin. And if one has to be perfect in veganism, why try it at all? Perfect, after all, is impossible“.

4.  Related, this story about vegan-shaming made me angry.

5.  Finding zero-waste balance.  Some sage advice from Erin on fitting some zero-waste actions into busy family life.

6.  Would you like pasta with that?  One solution to soggy paper straws.

7.  The complex privilege of shopping ethically.

8.  At 43, I became a vegetarian (and honestly, it wasn’t even hard).  Some lovely words from Sali Hughes:

I had no desire to join a gang that would have clean-eating charlatans and Morrissey for members. I could have it all ways – the occasional juicy steak or hearty pie, and still feel moral, moderate and zestful.

And so it happened while I wasn’t looking. Not so much a moment of clarity as a gradual falling away of scales. There simply came a point when there were so many conditions and disclaimers attached to my diet – no pork, no veal, no intensively farmed, only organic, sustainable and insanely expensive – that it just seemed easier and more honest to step up and stop altogether“.

9.  Why the ethical fashion movement can’t progress if it ignores plus-size shoppers.

10.  Finally, this article on seven things we’ve learned about Earth in the last 365 days is incredible.

Have a lovely Sunday!