I thought I’d start a new occasional series on Moral Fibres, about small house hacks.
Our house isn’t a tiny house per se, but it’s by no means a big house. When first build in the 1920’s it was a one bedroomed cottage. It’s gradually been extended over the years, upwards and outwards to be 3 bedroomed, but even then it has a small footprint. Let’s just say our youngest daughter’s bedroom doubles as an office and music room for my partner’s musical endeavours. It’s a good thing she’s not old enough to be bothered by these things!
We do love our house, but with four of us living here (plus pets) we do get on top of each other a bit. We’ve had to learn some clever tricks to maximise the space so as not to want to kill each other on a regular basis.
My first post of our small house hacks series is of the baby variety.
I was kindly given some Amazon vouchers as a gift from my work when I had my youngest. I sat on them for a while, as we kept a lot of our old baby gear and we felt there was nothing we didn’t already have or could borrow. As we hit the weaning stage at 6 months I knew we needed a highchair of sorts, and that’s where the vouchers came in.
With my eldest we had a wooden highchair that although looked lovely, was a pain in the bum all round. Our little Houdini managed to get out of the straps from an early age, it was a nightmare to get into the nooks and crannies to clean, and it took up a lot of room in our living room. I cursed the thing with ALL the swear words on a daily basis after constantly stubbing my toe on it.
Second time round I was adamant to go for function over style, and would not entertain a wooden highchair, as pretty as they are. And with no room to spare for even a folding high chair, I decided to look into travel high chairs. I came across this iSafe one, and thought it fitted the bill perfectly.
The iSafe travel highchair is pretty amazing. It takes up precisely zero floor space. It fixes securely to the table and my daughter can’t get out of the straps. We can take it off and take it to grandparents houses. And, for the biggie, when it gets dirty (which is often) you can pop it in the washing machine and it comes out spotless. We’ve been using it for 8 months now and it still looks like new, unlike the wooden high chair, which by this stage was completely encrusted in various unidentifiable foodstuffs.
We haven’t bought many baby things this time around, but it’s safe to say this is my favourite purchase. My daughter seems really happy in it too – she gets to sit right beside us and her big sister at mealtimes, and has a presiding view right over the dinner table. It’s her happy place, I’m sure.
I used Amazon because I had vouchers to use there, but I wouldn’t normally use Amazon. You can purchase the iSafe highchair directly from Baby Travel if you want to cut out the Amazon shaped middleman.
If you have any small house hacks you want to share, do pop them in the comments below!
A dash of child labour, a pinch of deforestation and sprinkle of unfair wages – do you know what’s in your make-up?
The make-up industry has been hitting the headlines recently with some damning reports on the sourcing, mining and processing of a key ingredient of many make-up items: mica. Why is this natural mineral causing such controversy and is it the only issue in the make-up supply chain? Georgina Rawes from Ethical Consumer reports on their latest findings for Moral Fibres, when investigating some of the most popular make-up brands.
Mica – the ugly truth behind the sparkle
Until Mica hit the headlines in February most consumers would have known very little about this naturally occurring mineral. Despite being found in nearly every make-up brand, providing the natural sparkle to eye shadows, lipsticks and blushers, its use had slipped under the radar.
Yet this glittering prize is not all it seems: behind the veneer of colourful shades, expensive marketing, and the promises of beauty there is an ugly truth.
Recent reports show that 25% of the world’s mica comes from illegal mines in the Jharkhand and Bihar regions of North East India and involves 20,000 child labourers. A recent ITV news investigation showed appalling working conditions, with children as young as six working in precarious mines.
Tunneling into the hillside to reach the mica deposits, workers have no protective equipment and the poorly constructed mines often collapse. Cartels, operating illegal mines, are generating huge profits whilst children work for meagre wages and miss out on the education that could lift them from this spiral of poverty. Between 5-10 children die in the mines each month and unreported adult fatalities are estimated to be much higher.
Despite the recent headlines these practices have been known about and challenged by campaigners for a decade. So surely this mica doesn’t end up in our cosmetic products here in the UK…
Invading the supply chain
In our recent investigations into the make-up industry, we discovered that all of the make-up brands that we examined used mica in their products but only one mainstream brand had a clear policy on the issue.
It is clear from the absence of policies and statements from cosmetics companies that illegally sourced mica could well be contained within the products that are sold here in the UK.
Lush made a pledge to remove mica from their products back in 2014 as they didn’t have the “purchasing power or local knowledge” to stay and make a difference, but they have spoken out about the difficulties that they faced in doing this. When trying to switch to synthetic mica they found that it also contains traces of natural mica. “We had no idea how difficult it would be,” said Stephanie Boyd, PR Manager for Lush.
Green People specifically stated that they do not use mica from India and instead source it from Malaysia.
Odylique stated that their mica was “ecologically and ethically obtained according to organic standards”.
L’Oréal was the only mainstream make-up brand to have a policy on their website and they state that 97% of their mica comes from secured sources, agreeing to work only with a limited number of suppliers in India who have committed to: “sourcing from legal gated mines only, where working conditions can be closely monitored and human rights respected”. Their plan to achieve 100% secured sources by the end of 2016.
Companies must do more
It’s hard to understand why other cosmetics brands haven’t done more to investigate their own mica supply chains, but there is a positive force for change coming.
In February 2017, the Responsible Mica Initiative was set up with the view to eradicating child labour and unacceptable working conditions in the mica supply chain within the next 5 years.
L’Oréal, Coty and Estée Lauder have all signed up to the initiative, which is promising as together with Boots they account for 60% of the total UK make-up sales.
Although this glittering rock has been responsible for so much damage in vulnerable communities over the last decade, at last, it seems that the picture may be changing. And there really is no excuse for the larger cosmetics companies not to be a driving force for change here.
Is mica the only supply chain issue for make-up brands?
At Ethical Consumer, we have produced reports on over 40,000 companies, brands and products, using calculations to assess and rank companies in all aspects of ethical behaviour.
Smaller businesses such as Odylique and Green People were the only companies to achieve the highest Ethical Consumer ratings for supply chain management.
The cosmetics giants such as Boots, Superdrug, L’Oréal, Coty, Estée Lauder all received the lowest ratings.
We found that many brands have inadequate clauses on child labour, guaranteed living wages and acceptable working hours in their supply chain policies and so fail to properly protect workers. Limited auditing and reporting on these issues also demonstrate a lack of commitment to finding and addressing issues.
Palm oil also an issue
We also found palm oil to be a concern within the make-up industry with companies such as Revlon and Coty having no publicly available policy on the sourcing of palm oil. Palm oil has been associated with human rights abuses and widespread deforestation, the lack of traceability of the sourcing of palm oil and its derivatives highlights further issues within cosmetics supply chains.
Across all judging criteria, some of the biggest cosmetics companies such as Superdrug, Boots and Loréal achieved some of the lowest ratings.
Ethical Consumer best buys
Whenever we run consumer reports we look to recommend those companies who are doing their part to produce ethical products. We have awarded our ‘Best Buy Label’ to Odylique (who feature a Fair Trade lipstick in their collection), Green People*, Neal’s Yard* and Lush. These companies have achieved at least a middle rating for their supply chain management, are certified as organic and/or have received a best rating for their animal testing policies.
Make-up shake up
Until large cosmetic companies, with their huge influence and enormous buyer power, can demonstrate that they are committed to managing a fair supply chain where workers are safe and paid fairly, it might be time to use your buying power to support the emerging ethical brands. It’s time for a make-up shake up.
Thanks to Georgina at Ethical Consumer for this great post. Score table copyright of Ethical Consumer.